The Effectiveness of an Elective About Fertility Awareness-Based Methods on Students’ Knowledge: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Nursing and Medical Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63264/yy0bta86Keywords:
nurses, medical education, fertility awareness-based methods, family planning, curriculumAbstract
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of an elective to improve students’ knowledge of fertility awareness-based methods for family planning and to determine whether there was a difference in knowledge gained by student type and/or course structure.
Design: A quasi-experimental study of pre- and post- assessment scores among three different groups of healthcare students.
Subjects: In one group, 24 undergraduate nursing students in a semester-long hybrid course. In a second group, 16 second year medical students in a six-week hybrid selective course. In the third group, 80 fourth year medical students in a two-week online elective for a total of 120 students completing the elective from January 2018 to June 2020.
Intervention: All students completed a knowledge assessment before the course, and the identical assessment after the course, with a maximum possible score of 20. ANOVA and non-parametric tests were used for data analysis.
Main Outcome Measure: The main outcome measure was comparison of post-course scores to pre-course scores.
Results: The mean pre-course score of about 50% in the undergraduate nursing group (x) was lower than the medical students in the six-week course (y) and two-week course (z) both about 70%. However, there was no difference in the mean post-course scores between the groups, which was about 90%.
Limitations: Assessments were mandated, but lectures were not, which could skew assessment scores. Additionally, the study focused on students signing up for the elective so it may not be generalizable to all medical and nursing student populations. Finally, educational interests and demographics impacting a student’s ability to learn and retain FABM knowledge is beyond the scope of this study.
Conclusion: This elective was effective in improving fertility awareness-based method knowledge of medical and nursing students. All student groups had strong post-course knowledge scores – 90% accuracy, regardless of course structure. A fully online elective has the potential to make this knowledge easily available worldwide.
References
1. Stanford JB, Lemaire JC, Thurman PB. Women’s interest in natural family planning. J Fam Pract. 1998 Jan;46(1):65–71. PMID: 9451372.
2. Leonard CJ, Chavira W, Coonrod DV, Hart KW, Bay RC. Survey of attitudes regarding natural family planning in an urban Hispanic population. Contraception. 2006 Oct;74(4):313–317. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.05.075. Epub 2006 Aug 2. PMID: 16982232.
3. Brewer M, Stevens L. Use of fertility awareness-based methods of contraception: Evidence from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2013–2017. Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):183–187. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 21. PMID: 33762172.
4. Duane M, Carson G, VanderKolk K, Adams E, Gordon L. An evaluation of US medical schools’ reproductive health and family planning curricula. Issues Law Med. 2022 Fall;37(2):117–128. PMID: 36629762.
5. Fehring RJ. The future of professional education in natural family planning. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Jan–Feb;33(1):34–43. doi:10.1177/0884217503258549. PMID: 14971551.
6. Beeman, P. (2010). Natural family planning in education and practice: A narrative review of the literature. The Linacre Quarterly, 77(4), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1179/002436310803888592.
7. Duane M, Stanford JB, Porucznik CA, Vigil P. Fertility awareness-based methods for women’s health and family planning. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 24;9:858977. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.858977. PMID: 35685421; PMCID: PMC9171018.
8. Manhart MD, Duane M, Lind A, Sinai I, Golden-Tevald J. Fertility awareness-based methods of family planning: A review of effectiveness for avoiding pregnancy using SORT. Osteopathic Family Physician. 2013;5:2–8. doi:10.1016/j.osfp.2012.09.002.
9. Peragallo Urrutia R, Polis CB, Jensen ET, Greene ME, Kennedy E, Stanford JB. Effectiveness of fertility awareness–based methods for pregnancy prevention: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:591–604. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002784.
10. Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. Vital Health Stat 23. 2010 Aug;(29):1–44. PMID: 20939159. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_029.pdf
11. Lamprecht V, Trussell J. Natural family planning effectiveness: Evaluating published reports. Adv Contracept. 1997 Jun–Sep;13(2–3):155–165. doi:10.1023/A:1006595703472. PMID: 9288333.
12. Grimes DA, Gallo MF, Grigorieva V, Nanda K, Schulz KF. Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Contraception. 2005 Aug;72(2):85–90. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2005.03.010. PMID: 16022845.
13. Simmons RG, Jennings V. Fertility awareness-based methods of family planning. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jul;66:68–82. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.12.003. Epub 2019 Dec 20. PMID: 32169418.
14. Festin MP, Kiarie J, Solo J, Spieler J, Malarcher S, Van Look PF, Temmerman M. Moving towards the goals of FP2020—classifying contraceptives. Contraception. 2016 Oct;94(4):289–294. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 7. PMID: 27287693; PMCID: PMC5032916.
15. Pedro J, Brandão T, Schmidt L, Costa ME, Martins MV. What do people know about fertility? A systematic review on fertility awareness and its associated factors. Ups J Med Sci. 2018 Jun;123(2):71–81. doi:10.1080/03009734.2018.1480186. Epub 2018 Jun 29. PMID: 29957086; PMCID: PMC6055749.
16. Perez Capotosto M. An integrative review of fertility knowledge and fertility-awareness practices among women trying to conceive. Nurs Womens Health. 2021 Jun;25(3):198–206. doi:10.1016/j.nwh.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 May 5. PMID: 33961806.
17. Nilsson A, Ahlborg T, Bernhardsson S. Use of non-medical contraceptive methods: A survey of women in western Sweden. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018 Dec;23(6):400–406. doi:10.1080/13625187.2018.1541079. Epub 2019 Jan 2. PMID: 30600721.
18. Smoley BA, Robinson CM. Natural family planning. Am Fam Physician. 2012 Nov 15;86(10):924–928. PMID: 23157145.
19. Choi J, Chan S, Wiebe E. Natural family planning: Physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practice. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Jul;32(7):673–678. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34571-6. PMID: 20707956.
20. Duane M, Motley R, Manhart M. Physicians need more education about natural family planning. Am Fam Physician. 2013 Aug 1;88(3):158–159. PMID: 23939690.
21. Steinauer J, LaRochelle F, Rowh M, Backus L, Sandahl Y, Foster A. First impressions: What are preclinical medical students in the US and Canada learning about sexual and reproductive health? Contraception. 2009 Jul;80(1):74–80. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Mar 31. PMID: 19501219.
22. Perez Capotosto M, Jurgens CY. Exploring fertility awareness practices among women seeking pregnancy. Nurs Womens Health. 2020 Dec;24(6):413–420. doi:10.1016/j.nwh.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Nov 3. PMID: 33157071.
23. Webb S, Cheng AL, Simmons R, Peragallo Urrutia R, Jennings V, Witt J. A mixed-methods assessment of health care providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices around fertility awareness-based methods in Title X clinics in the United States. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Sep 15;1(1):354–365. doi:10.1089/whr.2020.0065. PMID: 33786500; PMCID: PMC7784735.
24. Duane M, Waechtler L, May M, Manda D, Gomez NF, Stujenske TM. Fertility awareness-based methods for family planning and women’s health: Impact of an online elective. Fam Med. 2024 Jul;56(7):414–421. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2024.562177. Epub 2024 May 23. PMID: 38805634; PMCID: PMC11280182.
25. Danis PG, Kurz SA, Covert LM. Medical students’ knowledge of fertility awareness-based methods of family planning. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Jun 1;4:65. doi:10.3389/fmed.2017.00065. PMID: 28620604; PMCID: PMC5451495.
26. Gribble JN, Lundgren RI, Velasquez C, Anastasi EE. Being strategic about contraceptive introduction: The experience of the Standard Days Method. Contraception. 2008 Mar;77(3):147–154. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.11.001. PMID: 18279683.
27. Hilgers TW. The new women’s health science of NaProTECHNOLOGY. Arch Perinat Med. 2011;17(4):191–198.
28. Raviele KM. Natural family planning and ethical women’s health care. In: Notare T, Chaput CJ, editors. Humanae vitae, 50 years later: Embracing God’s vision for marriage, love, and life. Washington (DC): Catholic University of America Press; 2019. p. 183–198.
29. Salamonson Y, Andrew S, Everett B. Academic engagement and disengagement as predictors of performance in pathophysiology among nursing students. Contemp Nurse. 2009 Apr–Jun;32(1–2):123–132. doi:10.5172/conu.32.1-2.123. PMID: 19697983.
30. Warholak TL, Holdford DA, West D, DeBake DL, Bentley JP, Malone DC, Murphy JE. Perspectives on educating pharmacy students about the science of safety. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Sep 10;75(7):142. doi:10.5688/ajpe757142.
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this article are available in the article and via the corresponding author.
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marguerite Duane, Meredith Krutar, Kellie Wo, Logan Waechtler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY-4.0 permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.